|
"Take
Heed" Ministries
|
|
Cecil Andrews, PO BOX 13, Ballynahinch, BT24 8AL, Northern Ireland. Telephone/Fax 028 9756 5511. E-MAIL - takeheed@aol.com WEBSITE - http://www.takeheed.net |
March 2009
"Be not afraid or dismayed by reason of this great multitude for the battle is not yours but God's" (2nd Chronicles 20v15)
For most of the past year large swathes of the world
have been engulfed by what has come to be known as the ‘credit crunch’.
Supposedly prosperous nations in Asia, Australasia,
Western Europe, the British Isles and North America have been brought
financially to their knees. Some of these in times past would have been viewed
as bastions of Christianity but they have been found to be not only virtually
financially bankrupt but also to be spiritually bankrupt. In Deuteronomy
8:19-20 God issued a warning to His people as they were making their way to the
Promised Land - “And it shall be, if thou do at all forget the Lord thy God,
and walk after other gods, and serve them, and worship them, I testify against
you this day, that ye shall surely perish…because ye would not be obedient unto
the voice of the Lord your God”. The finances of many nations have been
destroyed by corruption in high places - and so it has also been with their
spiritual resources – they too have been corrupted. Much of this newsletter
brings to light some sources of such present-day and popular corruption. May
God be pleased to give His people discernment to preserve and prosper a
faithful spiritual heritage amongst the nations that will bring true glory to
Him, for that surely is one genuine biblical purpose that God has for His
redeemed people.
Your servant for Christ
CECIL ANDREWS
Page 2: Mary Baxter update and Gearóid
Marley conference. Pages 3-8
The ‘political pals’ of Rick Warren.
Pages 8-16: Mark Driscoll’s approach to preaching. Page 16: ‘Hail’ to
our god – DNA. Irish enclosure - Gearóid
Marley conference leaflet: Enclosure for all Rick
Warren and ‘politically-correct’ praying. Rick Warren and Judaism
The
two items on this page will have restricted geographical relevance but will
nevertheless also hopefully be a source of universal encouragement to all those
who receive this newsletter. With my last newsletter I enclosed a report on the
response to an appeal made to those on my mailing list who live in the UK. A
long-time and faithful elderly supporter of this ministry called Mary Baxter
had fallen victim last September to thieves who broke into her house whilst she
was at her church midweek meeting and they stole £4000.00 that she had been
planning to use the following day to pre-pay future funeral costs. In my
December newsletter enclosure I told how, thanks to a truly magnificent
response, the sum of £3990.00 had been donated and passed on to Mary. I am now
delighted to report that about mid-December I received a further gift of £20.00
to forward to her which meant that the entire amount stolen had been ‘made
good’ with a little extra to spare, so God, through His people, has been so
good.
For those on my mailing
list who live in Ireland there is a yellow enclosure with this newsletter
giving details of a planned Saturday morning conference to be held [DV] in Lisburn Congregational
Church on 18th April 2009. The speaker will be Gearóid Marley
who will relate his remarkable testimony to God’s grace. Some years ago Gearóid was studying at Maynooth [Roman Catholic] Seminary in the
South of Ireland when the Lord moved savingly in his life. He then went on to
study at an Evangelical Seminary in England and today Gearóid
pastors a Baptist church in the religiously and racially diverse city of
Birmingham in England. Gearóid will give two talks
dealing firstly with his salvation by God and then secondly with his service
for God. The attendance will be limited to 80 places and so I would
earnestly encourage those who wish to attend to apply as soon as possible for
the [free] tickets
using the application portion of the yellow enclosure. For those unable to
attend your prayers for this conference are truly coveted. [2]
The political pals of Rick Warren
In the article on the UK
ecumenical venture called HOPE 2008 that appeared in my December 2007 newsletter I wrote at one
point –
‘It is clear that for decades
now governments and global political organisations have sought to enlist the
help and co-operation of leading religious figures and religious initiatives
[Billy Graham and Rick Warren immediately spring to mind] to further their
‘one-world’ agenda’.
Somewhere
‘along the line’ in recent years I also stated that I felt that in many ways
Rick Warren was being ‘groomed’ as the successor to Billy Graham who for
decades was ‘paraded’ as the ‘evangelical Christian’ voice on special political
occasions and I very much had in mind, when I stated that, the American
Presidential inaugurations. For a number of years I have sought to sound
warnings about what I have perceived to be Rick Warren’s theological problems
and various articles written by myself and others have been posted to our ministry
website. Let me state clearly at the outset that according to the Great
Commission given by the Lord Himself to His disciples in Matthew 28:18-20 and
in Mark 16:15 the mission of Christ’s church here on earth is not to repair
this broken world for all people but through the preaching of the gospel of
‘Jesus Christ and Him Crucified’ to rescue and prepare Christ’s chosen people
for the next world. This world is destined for fiery divine judgment and not
for frantic human rejuvenation. The preaching of the true and exclusive gospel
of ‘Jesus Christ and Him Crucified’ is God’s appointed means for rescuing and
preparing His chosen and redeemed people – ‘salvation’ for human beings does
not come through Warren’s gospel of ‘marrying’ faith [any brand
of ‘faith’] communities to
politicians and business men. A clear understanding of Rick Warren’s ‘vision’
for what mission Christians should be involved in can be viewed on this
internet link
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=je2FDmsrxiA
There he speaks for almost 4
minutes and sets out his view of how this ‘broken’ world can be ‘repaired’. He
gave this interview just about a year ago when he attended a conference in Davos in Switzerland. This conference is known as the ‘World
Economic Forum’. In his talk Rick
Warren spoke of ‘2.3 billion Christians in the world’ – to arrive at
such a figure he must of course include members of the [3] Roman
Catholic religion and members of the various assorted ‘State-Controlled’
Orthodox churches – so much for discerning gospel truth from error. He also
referred to another of his political dalliances - his membership of America’s ‘Council
on Foreign Relations’ In simple response to Rick warren’s ‘vision’ I say
this - Peace, prosperity, call it what you like, in this world will not come
through the united efforts of a Rick Warren constructed
three-legged stool made up of Political Leaders, Business Leaders and People of
Faith – it will come through the return of the Prince of Peace, the Lord Jesus
Christ.
Just as a matter of passing
interest there was a further conference at Davos
[25-29 August 2008] known as the International Disaster and Risk Conference and
the details of it were described as follows
-
IDRC Davos 2008 will address a broad range of risks and threats including natural hazards, risks of a technical, biological and chemical nature, but also climate change, pandemics and terrorism, with a clear focus on a consistent and systematic risk management approach, to be able to take effective and efficient decisions for disaster risk reduction and mitigation measures, which lead to transparent and comparable results in different risk situations.
I have
absolutely no information that would suggest that Rick Warren attended this
particular conference but I would simply say this about all the supposed carbon
threat to planet earth - The fact
that someone has cut their carbon footprint will cut no ice when they stand
before the Judgment Seat of Christ.
Another article that sheds light on Rick Warren and refers to his
political dalliances can be found on the website of the Lighthouse Trails
Research Project based in Oregon, USA. I would especially draw attention to
this portion from that article
‘Warren called for "a new reformation"
to adapt to the 21st-century world… "You know, 500 years ago, the first
Reformation with Luther and then Calvin, was about beliefs. I think a new
reformation is going to be about behavior. The first
Reformation was about creeds; I think this one will be about deeds. I think the
first one was about what the church believes; I think this one will be about
what the church does. The first Reformation actually split Christianity into
dozens and then hundreds of different segments. I think this one is actually
going to bring them together"… Warren has convinced millions of people
that a new reformation is going to take place via the Purpose Driven Movement:
a reformation in which good works (deeds) must be practiced regardless of one's
religious beliefs or even lack of them. What beliefs one holds is secondary, according to Rick Warren.
At the 2005 United Nations [4] Prayer Breakfast, he told an audience of Christians, Hindus,
and Muslims, "God doesn't care what religion you are." He told
acclaimed broadcast journalist and interviewer, Charlie Rose, that his Purpose
Driven Peace Plan could include homosexuals, and he told the Pew Forum that his
reformation could include Muslims. And when he says that the first reformation
"split Christianity" and the new one will "bring them
[Catholicism and Protestantism] together, it broadens his reformation kingdom
even more. Rick Warren's reformation is an earthly man-inspired movement, and
this is why the emphasis cannot be placed on biblical doctrine - it would be
too limiting and constricting’.
One of those that featured
prominently on the Homepage of the website for the ‘World Economic Forum’ [2008]
was former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair. Since resigning from that office
he has established the ‘Tony Blair Faith Foundation’ that is pursuing
the similar goal of Rick Warren of trying to unite ‘people of faith’ – that of
course bears no relation to the Great Commission given by the Lord Jesus Christ
to His disciples. On the website announcing Mr Blair’s ‘Foundation’ there is
this interesting quote by him –
"If people of
different faiths can co-exist happily, in mutual respect and solidarity, so can
our world. And if faith takes its proper place in our lives, then we can live
with a purpose beyond ourselves alone, supporting humanity on its journey to
fulfilment."
In the light of such a statement [notice the
use of the word ‘purpose’] it should come therefore as no surprise to learn that
Rick Warren accepted an invitation to serve on the Advisory Council for
Mr Blair’s ‘Faith Foundation’. This Foundation has its own website and on the
website we read
‘those who have agreed to be members
[of the Advisory Council] are:
Dr Ismail Khudr AL-Shatti, Advisor in Diwan of HH the Prime Minister of Kuwait and former President
of the Gulf Institute for Futures and Strategic Studies
HE Dr Mustafa Ceric
, Grand Mufti of Bosnia -Herzegovina
The Right Reverend and Right
Honourable Richard Chartres, Lord Bishop of London
The Reverend David Coffey, President
of the Baptist World Alliance
The Reverend Joel Edwards, General
Director of the Evangelical Alliance
[5]
Professor Jagtar
Singh Grewal, former Chairman of the India Institute
of Advanced Study and former Vice-Chancellor of Guru Nanak Dev University
Roshi Joan Halifax, Abbot of the Upaya Zen Center
Right Reverend Josiah Idowu-Fearon, Bishop of Kaduna
Anantanand Rambachan,
Professor and Chair of the Religion Department at St. Olaf
College, Minnesota
Rabbi David Rosen, Chairman of the
International Jewish Committee on Interreligious
Consultations
Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks,
Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth
The Reverend
Rick Warren, Founding and Senior Pastor of Saddleback
Church
In
addition, HE Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor,
Archbishop of Westminster, will join the Advisory Council once he has retired
as Archbishop’.
After
leaving 10 Downing Street Mr Blair did not waste too much time before joining
the Roman Catholic church and of course in his new ‘faith’ roles he is very
much serving the Papal agenda and by serving on the ‘Advisory Council’
Rick Warren is likewise serving the aims of the Papal antichrist. This of
course was something that Billy Graham had likewise done for decades so my
‘guess’ that Rick Warren was being ‘groomed’ as a successor to Billy Graham has
not been wide of the mark.
It did in
fact reach its supreme fulfilment on 20th January when Barack Obama was inaugurated as
President of the United States and Rick Warren prayed for him just as Billy
Graham had prayed at previous Presidential Inaugurations.
In the
run-up to the Presidential Elections, interviews with the 2 main candidates
John McCain and Barack Obama
were conducted on American television by surprise, surprise, Rick Warren. It did not come therefore as much of a shock
to learn that Mr Obama had invited Rick Warren to ‘give
the invocation’ at his Presidential inauguration and so as I said earlier
in this I see Rick Warren very much stepping into the shoes of Billy Graham and
that is a sad day for the gospel and great commission of the Lord Jesus Christ
In a
recent ‘end of year’ report Mike Oppenheimer of ‘Let
Us Reason’ ministries wrote
[6]
‘Why have “Christian”
leaders joined with humanists, politicians and other world religions in the
task of achieving world peace through human efforts. There are many in the
church, in particular Robert Schuller and Rick Warren
that are willing to work with anyone they can to achieve this unity and
peace. Schuller’s
view on Islam is that we have the same goals in mind. He has said if he came
back one hundred years from now and everyone was Muslim it wouldn't bother him. Rick Warren says -
who's the man of peace in any village - or it might be a woman of peace - who
has the most respect, they're open and they're influential? They don't have to
be a Christian. In fact, they could be a Muslim, but they're open and they're
influential and you work with them to attack the five giants. And that's going
to bring the second Reformation (The Pew Forum on Religion May 23, 2005.) This
a Reformation to Unite All Religions not to bring Christianity back to its Biblical
roots. The Bible teaches the
ones who actually bring peace to others are those who bring the gospel (Romans
10). There are NO people of “faiths,” plural. There is only one faith and it
was delivered to the saints (Jude 3). It would seem that they by their actions
deny that God will save us just as the Humanist Manifesto states “No deity
will save us; we must save ourselves.” ('Humanist Manifiestos I and II, Paul Kurtz, ed.,p.
16.)…Warren’s peace plan is still a working model to resolve leading world problems.
Being asked to do the inauguration speech for the new presidency of Obama gives him a platform to many more to hear of it’.
Some years ago Rick
Warren unveiled his personal PEACE plan for the world and used each
letter of peace as an acrostic. Originally the P and E stood for ‘Planting
Churches’ and ‘Equipping church leaders’- clearly ‘Christian’ goals
– however these have now been changed to ‘Promoting reconciliation and ‘Equipping
servant leaders’ – these revised aims will clearly sit much more
comfortably with Rick Warren’s political pals and he obviously views that as
paramount. . By his words and actions over recent years Rick Warren has
shown clearly that he prefers to ‘court popularity’ rather than ‘preach Christ’
[alone] and for that he will one day have to give account to the One who alone
is truly all powerful “in heaven and in earth” [Matthew 28:18].
APPENDIX
Just a day or so after having written this article and having had it
posted to the ministry website I was reading a 1994 publication [7] ‘The
Tragedy of Compromise: The Origin and Impact of the New Evangelicalism’ by the late Dr Ernest Pickering [a gracious and godly Pastor who I, as a young-in-the-faith
believer, had the privilege of meeting at a conference in London in 1990] and I
came across these words written by him on pages 18-19 and I was greatly struck
by their relevance to the very concerns aired by myself in this article about
what would appear to be Rick Warren’s over-riding ‘ministry’ priorities –
‘Certainly
our modern society has many grievous problems which wrench the heart of a
believer. But we must follow Scripture and not our emotions. There is no
evidence in the New Testament of any church-sponsored social programs organised for the purpose of alleviating human suffering in
the unsaved world. Careful study of the New Testament will reveal that efforts
to meet social needs were confined for the most part to believers (Acts
4:32-37). James exhorts us to demonstrate our faith by helping fellow believers
who are “naked” or “destitute of daily food” (James 2:15). These and other
illustrations show us that the social concern of early believers was primarily
aimed at fellow believers and not at the world in general. This is not to]
say that individual believers cannot and should not show kindness and
generosity to the world’s needy. Certainly such behaviour
is appropriate and reflects the spirit of Christ. But…the main work of the
churches of Christ is not to minister to outward and physical human needs, but
to preach the gospel of the Son of God which speaks to a far deeper and more
eternal need – the salvation of the soul’.
Mark Driscoll’s approach to preaching
In early
January 2009 a lady who had been given some preaching tapes of Pastor Mark
Driscoll by a young relative contacted me. This lady, whilst acknowledging that
there was some commendable content on the tapes, was nevertheless uneasy about
some aspects of both the preaching style and content of Mark Driscoll and she
wanted to know my views on him. Mark Driscoll first came to my attention when I
was researching and preparing my talk on what is loosely termed ‘The Emerging
Church’. Unlike many of the perceived leaders of this grouping [people like Brian McLaren and Rob Bell] who are unwilling to stand up and
proclaim ‘thus saith the Lord’, Mark [8] Driscoll does defend and declare many of the
crucial doctrines revealed in God’s Word so he has in the past classed himself
as “swimming in the theologically conservative stream of the Emerging Church’.
However he is also willing to adopt some of the methodology associated with
those viewed as less ‘theologically conservative’ when it comes to the issue of
worship and Roger Oakland in his book entitled ‘Faith Undone’ writes on page 65
–
‘Stimulating images that
provide spiritual experiences are an essential element of the emerging church.
While many are bewildered why churches are darkening their sanctuaries and
setting up prayer stations with candles, incense, and icons, promoters of the
emerging church movement say they know exactly what they are doing. Mark
Driscoll of Mars Hill Fellowship explains – “Everything in
the service needs to preach – architecture, lighting, songs, prayers,
fellowship, the smell – it all preaches. All five senses must be engaged to
experience God”.’
This assertion
by Mark Driscoll flies in the face of Hebrews 11:1 that states “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the evidence of
things not seen” and is
contrary to Romans 10:17 where Paul writes “So then
faith cometh by hearing and hearing [literally – “the receiving of a message” - Vines Expository
Dictionary] by the word of God”.
It is through verbal/oral preaching, that does not bypass but addresses our mind and intellect, that Christian faith is established and built up and not through sensory perception. Pastor John MacArthur has written ‘True faith is not based on empirical [experience-based] evidence but on divine assurance and is a gift of God’ and on another occasion he similarly stated ‘Divine wisdom can't be empirically deduced... It comes only as a gift God gives when His Spirit reveals His Word to individuals’
Mark Driscoll
has also referred to himself as “theologically
conservative and culturally liberal” and it was really this “culturally liberal” aspect that had worried the lady who
contacted me. She was uneasy and disturbed by some of the worldly expressions
and sentiments expressed by Mark Driscoll on the tapes.
In the research for my
‘Emerging’ talk I came across a relevant article on http://www.mbcpathway.com/article108917c726992.htm and the following extracts refer to
information I have just shared on Mark Driscoll and highlight other disturbing
‘worldly views’ he expressed [9]
‘Missouri
Baptists had their first significant encounter with the “Emerging Church” in
December 2005 when former Missouri Baptist Convention (MBC) Executive Director
David Clippard recommended a $200,000 loan to a new
church plant in St. Louis, called The Journey…By the July 2006 board meeting,
the then MBC President Ralph Sawyer requested that the board’s church plant
workgroup investigate and report on mounting concerns regarding alcohol use
among some church plants…By the 2006 annual meeting of the Convention, Clippard declared in his executive director’s address that
the Journey’s pastor, Darrin Patrick, was a modern-day Caleb and portrayed The
Journey as a church plant model…by the December 2006 Executive Board meeting…it
was discovered that there were significant alcohol-related issues and that The
Journey had a bar-room ministry in a St. Louis micro brewery for nearly two
years called “Theology at the Bottleworks”… But the issues surrounding The Journey were much more
significant than just a bar-room ministry. It was also discovered that Patrick
serves as vice president of the Acts 29 Church Planting Network, a group of
young, Emerging Church planters that plant likeminded churches across the
United States, many of which are Southern Baptists, and a growing number of
which are young Missouri Baptists…The founder and president of Acts 29 is Mark
Driscoll, named by Christianity
Today as one of the most influential young preachers in America,
with over a million downloads of his sermons each year. Also known by his peers as “Mark the cussing
pastor,” Driscoll pastors Mars
Hill Church in Seattle, which he planted in 1996. Stating that, “I myself swim
in the theologically conservative stream of the Emerging Church,” Driscoll
claims to be “theologically conservative and culturally liberal.” Regarding the
use of alcohol, Driscoll writes: “My Bible study convicted me of my sin of
abstinence from alcohol,” at which time he “repented” and immediately began to
drink alcohol. Driscoll’s church website notes that the church has
“beer-brewing lessons whenever a large group of [Mars Hill] men get together.”
This would be in keeping with Driscoll’s view of Jesus, who, according to
Driscoll, began His public ministry at a wedding, where He “kicks things
off as a bartender.” This
past New Year’s Eve, Driscoll’s church hosted what they called a “Red Hot New
Year’s Eve Bash,” which included a “champagne bar” in the church (ID’s
were required for drinkers) and “bonus points” were offered for those whose
attire was “RED hot.” Driscoll is also founder of the Paradox Theater, a ministry of Mars Hill Church, which in its first
few years, hosted about 650 secular rock concerts for underage kids in
Seattle…Another concern about Acts 29 churches like The Journey is their “film night”
ministries where secular R-rated movies are viewed and then discussed. At the
Journey, four of the five most recent films that could be documented were
R-rated. According
to Driscoll, his church also has a film and [10] theology event that shows “an occasional unedited
R-rated movie.” Driscoll also writes that some of his “sermons on sex were
R-rated,” and notes that he gives “warnings to parents and sometimes saw whole
visiting youth groups walk out blushing halfway through the sermon.”
Apart
from his dangerous views on alcohol Mark Driscoll was also identified as being
clearly “culturally liberal” in his ‘preaching’ approach to the issue of sex
and related matters. This link http://www.apologeticsindex.org/789-mark-driscoll
quotes a secular newspaper article written about Mark Driscoll and here are
some extracts [Cecil – I am very conscious that these extracts include
language that God’s people would undoubtedly prefer not to be confronted with
but for the sake of correctly addressing the concerns about ‘Mark
Driscoll’s approach to preaching’ I do feel it is necessary to present
the relevant “evidence”] –
‘The
following is quoted from an article in the New York Times Magazine. It is
titled, Who Would Jesus Smack Down? Mark
Driscoll’s sermons are mostly too racy to post on GodTube,
the evangelical Christian “family friendly” video-posting Web site. With
titles like “Biblical Oral Sex” and “Pleasuring Your Spouse,” his clips do not
stand a chance against the site’s content filters. No matter: YouTube is where Driscoll, the pastor of Mars Hill Church
in Seattle, would rather be. Unsuspecting sinners who type in popular keywords
may suddenly find themselves face to face with a husky-voiced preacher in a
black skateboarder’s jacket and skull T-shirt. An “Under 17 Requires Adult
Permission” warning flashes
before the video cuts to evening services at Mars Hill, where an anonymous
audience member has just text-messaged a question to the screen onstage: “Pastor Mark, is masturbation a
valid form of birth control?” Driscoll doesn’t miss a beat: “I had one guy
quote Ecclesiastes 9:10, which says, ‘Whatever your hand finds to do, do it
with all your might.’ ” The audience bursts out laughing. Next Pastor Mark is
warning them about lust and exalting the confines of marriage, one hand jammed
in his [11] jeans pocket while the other waves his Bible. Even
the skeptical viewer must admit that whatever
Driscoll’s opinion of certain recreational activities, he has the coolest
style and foulest mouth of any preacher you’ve ever seen… Driscoll
represents a movement to revamp the style and substance of evangelicalism. With
his taste for vintage baseball caps and omnipresence on Facebook
and iTunes, Driscoll, who is 38, is on the cutting
edge of American pop culture. Driscoll disdains the prohibitions of traditional
evangelical Christianity. Taboos on alcohol, smoking, swearing and violent
movies have done much to shape American Protestant culture… the Bible tells him
that to seek salvation by self-righteous clean living is to behave like a
Pharisee’ [Cecil – I
believe Mark Driscoll is here misrepresenting the biblically based views of
many Christians – genuine believers know that ‘clean living’ will never save
anyone but they also know that those whom God has truly saved should
subsequently exhibit ‘clean living’ - Paul stated in Acts 26:17-20 how he had
been commissioned by God to go to the gentiles to “open their eyes…to turn them
from darkness to light and from the power of Satan” so that they should “repent
and turn to God and DO WORKS MEET (befitting or becoming) FOR REPENTANCE” –
they should exhibit evidence of having truly been converted – this echoes John
the Baptist’s words to those coming forward for baptism in Luke 3:7-8 and of
course baptism is for those already saved]
By way of
response to Mark Driscoll’s use of sexually explicit language I want first to
turn to a recent article on this topic by Pastor John MacArthur
and herewith are what I consider to be some relevant extracts
–
Grunge
Christianity
Counterculture's
Death-Spiral and
the
Vulgarisation of the Gospel
John MacArthur [12]
One
of the favourite topics on the evangelical agenda these days is how the church
should "engage the culture." Do Christians need to imitate the
boorish aspects of a quickly-decaying civilization in order to remain
"relevant"? Some evidently think so…Mark
Driscoll is one of the best-known representatives
of that kind of thinking. He is a very effective communicator--a bright, witty,
clever, funny, insightful, crude, profane, deliberately shocking, in-your-face
kind of guy. His soteriology (doctrine
of salvation) is exactly right, but that only makes his
infatuation with the vulgar aspects of contemporary society more disturbing…I
don't know what Driscoll's language is like in private conversation, but I
listened to several of his sermons. To be fair, he didn't use the sort of
four-letter expletives most people think of as cuss words--nothing that might get bleeped on broadcast
television these days. Still, it would certainly be accurate to
describe both his vocabulary and his subject matter at times as tasteless,
indecent, crude, and utterly inappropriate for a minister of Christ. In every
message I listened to, at least once he veered into territory that ought to be
clearly marked off limits for the pulpit. Some of the things Driscoll talks
freely and frequently about involve words and subject matter I would prefer not
even to mention in public [Cecil – the New York Times article gives ample examples of these], so I am not going to quote
or describe the objectionable parts…The point I want to make is not about Driscoll's language per se, but about the underlying
philosophy that assumes following society down the Romans 1 path [Cecil – where God
gives sinners over to indulge in their sinful, decadent excesses] is a valid way
to "engage the culture." It's possible to be overexposed to our
culture's dark side. I don't think anyone can survive full immersion in
today's entertainments and remain spiritually healthy…We
could learn from the example of Paul, who engaged the philosophers on Mars Hill
[Cecil – how apt but also ironic as this is the name of Mark
Driscoll’s church in Seattle].
But far from embracing their culture, he was repulsed by it.
Acts 17:16 says, "while Paul waited for [Silas & Timothy] at Athens,
his spirit was provoked within him when he saw that the city
was given over to
idols"…Even Jesus' high priestly prayer [see
John 17:14-16] included a thorough
description of the Christian's proper relationship with and attitude toward the
world…Whenever Jesus spoke of believers being in the world, He stated that if
we are faithful, the world will be a place of hostility and persecution, [13]
not a zone of comfort. He also
invariably followed that theme with a plea for our sanctification [see John
17:17-19]… I frankly wonder how any
Christian who takes the Bible at face value could ever think that in order to
be "culturally relevant" Christians should participate in society's growing infatuation with vulgarity.
Next
I want to quote a telling passage from pages 41-42 of John MacArthur’s
book ‘The Truth War’ that seems to speak to this issue of being ‘culturally
liberal’ –
‘The
Nicolaitans were a dangerous sect and they may well
have been the very “wolves” Paul cautioned against in the famous prophetic
warning of Acts 20…there is a considerable amount of evidence that Nicolaitanism was indeed bred and incubated by men who had
achieved stature as leaders in the church. Apparently when the Nicolaitans were rejected in Ephesus they went to a nearby
church plant at Pergamos where they gained a
following in that church. Christ’s message to Pergamos
in Revelation 2:12-17 is almost entirely given to rebuke, because the church
had embraced “those who hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans”
(v15). What was the doctrine? It is described in verse 14 as a kind of radical
licentiousness “thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who
taught Balak to cast a stumbling block before the
children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols and to commit
fornication”. They
were using Christian liberty as a cloak for vice and an opportunity for the
flesh [Galatians 5:13; 1st Peter 2:16]
(Cecil – going back to Mark Driscoll’s own admission that ‘his
church also has a film and theology
event that shows “an occasional unedited R-rated movie’ is he not conscious
of the Lord’s statement in Matthew 5:28 “I say unto you that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed
adultery with her already in his heart” and is he oblivious to the fact
that by staging such an event he is opening the door to the committing of just
such sin by those in attendance?) This was evidently the very same kind of error
the epistle of Jude was written to address because Jude refers [v4] to the
false teachers he opposed as “ungodly men turning the grace of our God into
lasciviousness” [lewdness] and he says [v11] they
“ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward”. Licentious behaviour and
greed were key characteristics of all forms of Gnosticism. That was a
deadly [14] brand of false
religion that flourished in the second century and often infiltrated the
church, masquerading as Christianity”.
I
want now to draw attention to what Paul wrote to the believers in Ephesus and
Philippi on how they were to behave in the midst of their prevailing ‘culture’.
To
those in Ephesus Paul wrote in Ephesians 5:1 “Be ye therefore followers [Cecil
– According to Vines this means literally – ‘become imitators’] of God, as dear
children” and in verses 3-4 he writes “But fornication
and all uncleanness…let it not be once named among you, as becometh
saints; Neither filthiness nor foolish jesting which are not fitting” [Cecil
– surely this is a severe rebuke of the incident reported in the New York Times
article that evoked an outburst of audience laughter]. Paul goes on to issue
this warning in verses 6-8 “Let no man deceive you with vain [Cecil
– literally ‘empty’] words…Be not ye
therefore partakers with them. For ye were once darkness [Cecil
– unregenerate and dying in your sins] but now are ye light in the Lord; walk as
children of light”.
Then
in verses 11-12 Paul gives guidelines to
believers as to how to interact with the pervading immoral ‘culture’ that
surrounds God’s children “have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of
darkness but rather reprove them. FOR IT IS A SHAME EVEN TO SPEAK OF THOSE
THINGS WHICH ARE DONE OF THEM IN SECRET”.
Finally,
to the believers in Philippi, Paul gave this closing exhortation in Philippians
4:8 “Finally brethren, whatever things are true, whatever things are honest, whatever things
are just, WHATEVER THINGS ARE PURE [John MacArthur study notes – “That which is morally clean and
undefiled”], whatever things are lovely, whatever things are
of good report; IF THERE BE ANY VIRTUE [Cecil – According to
Vines – ‘moral excellence’], and if there be any
praise, THINK [Cecil – According to Vines – ‘make those things
the subjects of your thoughtful consideration] ON THESE THINGS”.
Matthew
Henry summarises his commentary on these verses by saying ‘It gives a great
force to what we say to others when we can appeal to what they have seen in
us”. In contrast to those wise words it would appear that Mark Driscoll is
saying to ‘others’ – “I can be just like you” instead of saying to them “you
should be like me”.
[15]
In
a sermon I heard preached some months ago the minister gave two challenging
quotes – the first was attributed to the godly Scottish minister Robert
Murray McCheyne [1813-1843] – Mr McCheyne apparently once commented ‘My peoples’ greatest
need is my personal holiness’. The second was attributed to Richard
Baxter [1615-1691] a Puritan who
apparently once said ‘Too many men are ministers before they know how
to be Christians’. Could these be statements for Mark Driscoll to ‘ponder
in his heart’?
I think Mark Driscoll and those who
accept his ‘approach to preaching’ should above all take time to reflect
on these words of Scripture
“And be not conformed to this world, but
be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind that ye may prove what is that
good and acceptable and perfect will of God” [Romans 12:2]
“what fellowship hath righteousness with
unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness?”
[2nd Corinthians 6:14]
“friendship of the world is enmity with
God” [James 4:4].
‘Hail’ to our ‘god’ – DNA
With
this year being a double anniversary where Charles Darwin is concerned, his
birth [200 years ago] and the publication of
‘Origin of the Species’ [150 years ago] not
surprisingly organisations like the BBC have gone into ‘overdrive’ with programmes
extolling the ‘gospel’ of evolution. In correspondence I received late in 2008
someone enclosed a little printed card that sums up the mindset of many today
‘The
modern man is too clever to believe in God the creator, but do you know what he
does believe in? He believes in a chemical compound called the DNA molecule. If
you ask the modern atheist: “How has the world come into being?” he will tell
you: “There was some original undifferentiated protoplasm”. “Well” you say,
“how has man come out of that? How have all the animals come out of that? Where
has music come from? Where has love come from? Where has poetry come from? How
has that undifferentiated matter developed into man with all his greatness and
intellect? You will be told: “In the nucleus of every cell there is this
chemical molecule called DNA and this has produced everything; this has
determined everything; this guides everything. Now DNA molecule has not got a
mind, has not got reason, has not got understanding, has not got a will…and yet
modern man, who does not believe in God the Almighty Creator, is prepared to
believe in the DNA molecule! How strange that learned men should be capable of
believing in the determining power of a chemical compound and yet reject the
eternal and everlasting God’.
[16]
Photocopies of the following
articles were also enclosed with the newsletter -
http://www.takeheed.net/CurrentConcerns_2/Warren_inaugural_prayer.htm
http://www.takeheed.net/CurrentConcerns_2/Rick_Warren_Judaism.htm