|
"Take
Heed" Ministries
|
|
Cecil Andrews, 29 Edengrove Park, Ballynahinch, BT24 8AZ, Northern Ireland Telephone/Fax 028 9756 5511. E-MAIL - takeheed@aol.com WEBSITE - http://www.takeheed.net Quick Links - Home - Assorted Articles - Audio/Video - Ministry Newsletters - Words of Wisdom |
Welcome to the Church of Ireland
Diocese of Sodom and Gomorrah
In Luke 17 the Lord Jesus
Christ outlined what conditions would be like just before He returns again to “judge
the world in righteousness” [Acts 17:31]. He referred back to God’s earlier
judgments by a worldwide flood and localised fire and brimstone and said,
“as it was in the days of Noah so shall it be also in the days of the Son of
Man. They did eat…until the flood came and destroyed them all. Also as it was
in the days of Lot; they did eat…But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it
rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even thus shall
it be in THE DAY when the Son of Man is revealed” [Luke 17:26-30].
Conditions pertaining “in the days of Noah” are vividly described
in Genesis 6:5 “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the
earth and that every imagination [purpose and desire] of the
thoughts of his heart was only evil continually”. As the
saying goes, it does not take ‘rocket science’ to look at today’s world and to
see and to read of the uncontrolled wickedness that pervades every continent on
planet earth and to realise that the heart of mankind is today spewing forth
those evils identified by the Lord Himself in Matthew 15:19 “out of the
heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false
witness, blasphemies”.
Sandwiched in amongst that list of
evils identified by the Lord we find “fornications” and the Greek used,
according to Vine’s Expository Dictionary, means ‘illicit sexual
intercourse’. We also learn from
Vine’s that in Jude 7 a strengthened form of the Greek for fornication
is used meaning ‘to give oneself up to fornication, implying excessive
indulgence’.
In Jude 6 the matter of
God’s future judgment of fallen angels when Christ returns is addressed when
Jude writes, “And the angels, who kept not their first estate, but left
their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness
unto the judgment of the great day”.
The future judgment of these
fallen angelic beings is then likened to what happened “in the days of Lot” and
in Jude 7 we learn what conditions were pertaining then for we read “Even
as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about themselves in like manner, giving
themselves over to fornication and going after strange flesh are set forth for
an example suffering the vengeance of eternal fire”. Again it does not take
‘rocket science’ to look at today’s world and to see and to read of the
uncontrolled “fornications” [‘implying excessive indulgence’]
that pervades every continent on planet earth.
But there was another perverse
feature identified in Jude 7 that pertained “in the days of Lot”
– the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah were not only given over to “fornication”
but also to “going after strange flesh” – a sin that
apparently the fallen “angels” that are “reserved…unto
the judgment” had also been guilty of. What can this possibly mean? The
following is a portion from a sermon preached by Pastor John MacArthur [full text
can be seen on http://www.biblebb.com/files/mac/sg2124.htm]
‘The angels left the
habitation in heaven that God had designed for them. Having deliberately turned
away from that which was consistent with their nature, the angels became
apostates by also turning their backs on the place that God had assigned to
them. Verse 7 gives us some clues as to the specifics of their iniquity: "Even
as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, [these
angels] giving themselves over to fornication...." Whatever those
angels did, it was the same thing that Sodom and Gomorrah did, namely,
committing fornication: "going after strange flesh" (v. 7b).
The angels are described in
verse 6. They appear to be a likely antecedent of the word "themselves"
in verse 7. Therefore, I believe that verse 7 is saying that the angels were
giving themselves over to fornication. So, what did those angels do? They
didn't keep their first estate. Second, they left the normal place that their
nature and design by God required of them. Third, they gave themselves over to
a gross kind of sexual evil in the same way that Sodom and Gomorrah did.
Do you
remember what the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was? The men of those cities lusted
after the angels who were staying with Lot. The fallen angels in verse 6 did
the same thing that Sodom and Gomorrah did, except in reverse--they lusted
after humans. They entered into a terrible perversion of sex. The "strange
[Gk. heteras = `different'] flesh" was of a different nature
than theirs. Just as the men of Sodom lusted after the angels, so the angels
lusted after human flesh and committed fornication with human women’.
To expand
on ‘so the angels lusted after human flesh and committed
fornication with human’ Pastor MacArthur goes on to say –
‘The
account involving those angels is recorded in Genesis 6:1- 4: "And it
came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and
daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men
that they were fair; and they took them wives of all whom they chose. And the
LORD said, My Spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is
flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in
the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto
the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty
men who were of old, men of renown." The following verses tell us that
God destroyed almost all life on the earth because man had become so corrupt.
I believe
that "the sons of God" refers to fallen angels, who produced a
race of mighty creatures: half demon, half man. One of the reasons God brought
the flood was in order to destroy that half-breed race. Now some people object
here. They say, "You can't have angels there in Genesis 6 because of
Matthew 22:30." That verse says, "For in the resurrection they
[people] neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels
of God in heaven." Where is it that angels don't marry? In heaven.
That's the first distinction you have to make. Matthew 22:30 is limited to the
holy angels, the ones in heaven. It's not saying anything about angels that had
been cast out of heaven and are now on earth. Matthew 22:30 only implies that
angels cannot procreate among themselves.
People
will say that angels couldn't impregnate women, because they assume that angels
are without sex distinction. But the Bible doesn't say that. On the contrary,
whenever they took on a human body, they always took on that of a male. The
verse is only talking about the holy angels in heaven, and it merely implies
that angels can't procreate among their own kind. It's not talking about the
demons, and it's not saying that they can't unite with humans’.
We need to note from what Pastor MacArthur preached
that fallen angelic beings wanted to engage in sexual activity with humankind
and that equates to “going after strange flesh.”
In consequence we learn from all this that
just as fallen angels lusted after “strange flesh” so the men of Sodom
likewise lusted after “strange flesh” when they lusted after these
obviously male-in-appearance angels.
We read
Lot’s greeting to these angels in Genesis 19:2 “And he [Lot] said,
Behold now, my Lords, turn in I pray you into your servant’s house and tarry
all night” and we read of the entreaties of the men of Sodom in Genesis
19:5 “And they [the men of Sodom] called unto Lot and said
unto him, Where are the men who came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto
us that we may know them”.
So the men
of Sodom wanted to “know” these male-in-appearance guests staying with
Lot. Pastor MacArthur in his Bible Study notes writes about this desire to ‘know’
‘They [the men
of Sodom] sought homosexual relations with the visitors. God’s attitude
towards this vile behaviour became clear when he destroyed the city’
From a
much earlier generation Matthew Henry is his commentary on this incident writes
as follows –
‘1. It was the most unnatural and
abominable wickedness that they were now set upon, a sin that still bears their
name, and is called SODOMY. They were carried headlong by those vile
affections [Romans 1:26-27], which are worse than brutish… Those that allow
themselves in unnatural uncleanness are marked for the vengeance of eternal
fire. See Jude 1:7.
2. They were not ashamed to own it,
and to prosecute their design by force and arms…
3. When Lot interposed, with all the
mildness imaginable, to check the rage and fury of their lust, they were most
insolently rude and abusive to him… He reasoned with them, pleaded the laws of
hospitality and the protection of his house which his guests were entitled to;
but he might as well have offered reason to a roaring lion and a raging bear as
to these head-strong sinners, who were governed only by lust and passion. Lot's
arguing with them does but exasperate them; and, to complete their wickedness,
and fill up the measure of it, they fall foul upon him… They threaten him, and
lay violent hands upon him; and the good man is in danger of being pulled in
pieces by this outrageous rabble… Those that hate to be reformed hate those
that reprove them… Abuses offered to God's messengers and to faithful reprovers
soon fill the measure of a people's wickedness, and bring destruction without
remedy. See Proverbs 29:1 “He that being often reproved, hardeneth his neck,
shall suddenly be destroyed and that without remedy.”
In recent days I have had my attention drawn to a
group calling itself ‘Changing Attitude Ireland’. On the welcome page of
their website we read the following –
A network of people, gay and straight, lay and ordained, working for the full affirmation of lesbian and gay Christians within the Churches in Ireland.
3.
Working for change in the official teaching and attitude of the Churches in
Ireland.
4. Equality of opportunity to LGBT people, including the ordination and preferment of partnered lesbian and gay clergy
Changing
Attitude Ireland
Cathedral Buildings
64 Donegall Street
Belfast BT1 2GT
Northern
Ireland
Basically this group are seeking to ‘sanctify’ and legitimatise’ practices that quite clearly are viewed by God as exceedingly sinful and that shall warrant His certain judgment just as in times past. They are of course seeking to advance their views under a cloak of being ‘Christian’ and so they have their own ‘Statement of Faith’. I plan now to reproduce some sections of it [portions underlined] from their own website and to add in red by way of response some very relevant verses of scripture.
|
What
we believe |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that:
Prejudice
is unacceptable
What about the Bible?
We have a high view of the bible - the Word of God
nourishes all we think and do. Bible reading and study is one of the
things that all Christians are called by God to take seriously. “Blessed are they that
hear the word of God and keep it" [Luke 11:28]. “He that
hath my commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me…Jesus
answered and said unto him, If a man love me he will keep my words and
my Father will love him and we will come unto him and make our abode
with him. He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings” [John 14:21;
23-24] We do not accept that biblical references to homosexual behaviour in
scripture can be fairly applied to the kind of faithful, lifelong
relationships we wish to defend. The Sodom story [“But the men of Sodom
were wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly” Genesis 13:13] in
Genesis concerns gang rape [NO! -“going after
strange flesh” Jude 7], not a loving, permanent partnership,
and its primitive morality (for example, when Lot offers his daughters to be
raped instead of the men) means we can hardly take the text as an ethical
guide. Similarly, while Leviticus includes homosexuality in its list of
‘abominations’ we must also note that it condemns a number of activities
(lending money for interest; shaving the beard; weaving two kinds of cloth
together), which scarcely worry us today. [In
a letter published in the Belfast Telegraph on 21st June 2008 John
Montgomery wrote – ‘Many of the rules given to Israel during
their wilderness wanderings were specifically for their health and welfare in
that particular situation. Some were ceremonial laws for the Jews and were
fulfilled in Christ and abolished (Colossians
2:13-17). However the moral law summed up in the Ten Commandments is
perpetually binding on all mankind. The New Testament makes it clear that
theft, murder, fornication, adultery and homosexual practices are sinful and
if not repented of will exclude people from the Kingdom of God’ (1st Corinthians 6:9-10).] When Paul mentions homosexual behaviour in Romans
1, 1 Corinthians 6 and 1 Timothy 1, it is highly unlikely that he had in mind
the concept of an equal same-sex partnership “ Lean not unto thine
own understanding” [Proverbs 3:5], but rather homosexual
prostitution and pederasty, which were the most visible kind of homosexual
practice in his own society. Also, it is clear from Romans 1.26 and 27 which
mention men and women ‘exchanging’ homosexual sex, that Paul, like other
Jewish and early Christian writers, believed homosexuality was a free and
perverse choice, whereas we now understand that for most gay people there is
no choice in the matter at all. “There is a
way which seemeth right unto a man but the end thereof are the ways of death”
[Proverbs 14:12; 16:25]. “God gave them over to a reprobate mind to do those
things which are not seemly…who knowing the judgment of God, that they who do
such things are worthy of death, not only do the same but have pleasure in
them that do them” [Romans 1: 28 & 32] We find it ironic that most of those who disagree
with us quote these few, highly ambiguous passages at us, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is
abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself”
[Leviticus 19:22-23]“Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the
field…And he said…Yea hath God said” [Genesis 3:1] while
finding reasons to ignore other much clearer and more numerous scriptural
texts - against divorce and remarriage, for example, or against women holding
positions of authority. Their highly selective brand of literalism shows
clearly that their position is based on prejudice, not on any genuine concern
for biblical authority. “woe unto them who are
wise in their own eyes…who justify the wicked for reward and take away the
righteousness of the righteous from him” [Isaiah 5:21 & 23] |
How does God view those nations
that tolerate Sodomy in their midst – in 1st Kings 14 21 & 24
we read “And Judah did evil in the sight of the Lord and they provoked
him to jealousy with their sins…And there were also sodomites in the land; and
they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the Lord cast
out before the children of Israel”. One chapter later we read in 1st
Kings 15: 11-12 “And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord, as
did David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land”.
A promotional leaflet issued by
this group lists the following 3 clergymen as being ‘Patrons’ – Canon Fred
Graham; Rev Gordon Graham and Very Rev Victor Griffin. A browse of the groups’
website on http://www.changingattitudeireland.org/index.html
will reveal details of other ‘clergy’ [including a number of Roman Catholic
priests] that are happy to be associated with the aims of this organisation.
To them in particular God sends
this message “Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil; who put
darkness for light, and light for darkness…Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble
and the flame consumeth the chaff, so their root shall be as rottenness and
their blossom shall go up as dust because they have cast away the law of the
Lord of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel” [Isaiah 5:20
& 24]…”To the law and to the testimony; if they speak not according to this
word it is because there is no light in them” [Isaiah 8:20]…”such are false
apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of
Christ. And no marvel for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
Therefore it is no great thing if HIS ministers also be transformed as the
ministers of righteousness, whose end shall be according to their works” [2nd
Corinthians 11: 13-15].
REFORM IRELAND are a
group of professing Evangelicals within the Church of Ireland and in one of the
articles on their website that can be viewed on http://www.reform-ireland.org/article/242
they wrote the following - ‘It is now apparent that
the Archbishop of Armagh, and others, have an open agenda to work for the full
acceptance and inclusion of the LGBT lifestyles within the Church of Ireland…It
has become clear over recent times that there is now a co-ordinated effort to
promote the acceptance of liberal-revisionist sexual agenda within the Church
of Ireland. Reform Ireland are saddened that no ‘orthodox’ bishop has spoken
out against this latest development but that once again it will be left to
parochial clergy to give leadership to the majority of people within the Church
of Ireland who are opposed to such innovations and departure from the Word of
God and historical Church teaching.’
Perhaps the ‘parochial clergy’ may
be able to draw strength and direction from the following. Close to my computer
workstation I have the 2008 Motto Text of a group of believers that meet
monthly in a little mission hall in Co Fermanagh and it seems to be a most
appropriate text to quote in closing this article - “Let us cleanse
ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in
the fear of God” [2nd Corinthians 7:1].
Cecil
Andrews – ‘Take Heed’ Ministries – 25th September 2008